This conversation is totally imaginary, but totally plausible; thus, like all fiction, making it at least as true as anything that has actually taken place.
Karen: Thank you for agreeing to meet with me to discuss the potential of my PhD candidacy.
Academic Dude (AD): No problem at all … [added under breath] … it’s what I’m paid to do.
Karen: Excuse me?
AD: Nothing. Now tell me what you have in mind. [Reaches for a piece of paper.] It says here that in the past you expressed an interest in a specific avenue of postgraduate study.
Karen: That’s correct.
AD: And what was the subject?
Karen: It was going to be a feminist-slash-critical-slash-cultural-studies-flavoured reading of the television show Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
AD: This is no longer of interest?
Karen: Oh, it is. I just figured it has been done to death already. “She saved the world. A lot.” But, hey, it’s over now.
AD: In any case, I feel I need to explain that at this particular university we prefer our research students to continue on in the field in which they began. Your Masters thesis was on Post-Freudian Psychoanalytic Literary Theory in Gothic Literature.
Karen: In a nutshell, yeah …
AD: You don’t sound too enthused.
Karen: I suppose I’m still a little Freud-fatigued.
AD: So that’s a ‘no’?
Karen: I’m just afraid of becoming too specialised, I guess.
AD: Um – this is a PHD. That’s the POINT. [AD picks up a pencil and starts to nibble the end where the eraser is missing. Presumably already eaten.]
Karen: That’s why I was wanting to ask how creative I can get with my scope of it. Or at least have someone as a sounding-board for my ideas.
AD: And what are they?
Karen: I’m sure I could do it in creative writing, which is what I primarily want, and make the exegesis literally drip with lit theory – because I really miss that, actually – in such a way that will be publishable on its own merits, aside from the creative writing part which will, obviously, kick ass. Somehow, someway, I want to weave all the below in because I love them all and can’t decide. Think CULTURAL MASH-UP.
In no particular order I’d like to study:
The concept of ‘The Renaissance Man’ as it has been redefined by James Franco
Hamlet
Literature in the Fin de siècle era
The friendship of Hemingway and Fitzgerald
Helen Garner
The Australian bush and how it is depicted and conveyed in a genderised sense [AD: YAWN]
Angela Carter
Buffy [Karen: I still like it!]
Literary feuds
The rise of post-apocalyptic fiction
How does that sound?
AD: [Takes a moment to flicker a look of distaste before turning to gaze out the window. Outside, the branch of a eucalyptus tree dips up and down from the wind. He begins to mutter...] … I could be writing my novel right now. I could be at home, revising that chapter. It will be great! It will be my making! Instead, no. I’m here.
Karen: Oh! I’ve thought of something else! ZOMBIES!
AD: [Folds his arms across each other on the table, puts his head down and starts to cry.]
Karen: I’m thinking I need to go think about it some more?
AD: [Still face down, nods.]
Karen: Fair enough. I’ll just see myself out. Thanks for your time!












{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
I would love to read your thesis on James Franco as Renaissance Man. Or on literary feuds! Or Buffy, really (although I agree that it’s been done to death at this point).
Rachel recently posted..How to be a human being on the internet
I would also love love love to read that!
I’m reading your blog for the first time here (c/o link from EdenLand) so I don’t know your interests well but from that list it sounds like you might enjoy “The Dreaming” by Queenie Chan. It’s a (Japanese style) manga written by an Australian using the bush as a horror motif (ala “Picnic at Hanging Rock”). I’m totally going to write a paper about it one day… maybe…
Sophelia recently posted..The Wrong Shoes. Or Naked.
Ha!
If you substitute “but your Masters was on reading race and difference in Puritan New England” for your Freudian thing, this conversation would be very, very similar to the one I’d have with an imagined potential PhD supervisor in my field (history).
My preferred PhD would study , in no particular order, the relationship between history, myth and folk stories in modern storytelling; the role of race and difference in dystopias and utopias in 20th century fiction, including film and TV; Agatha Christie; new media and the democratisation of voices; the effect of incongruity in history; chance being a fine thing; Horrible Histories, bodice-rippers and history as entertainment; Terry Pratchett; and a bit of a shit fight with some established historical positions.
Written partly in poetic form, and partly as a story.
I do not think the academy is ready for either of us…

Kathy recently posted..Shipping, happy endings, and all the stories
Picnic at Hanging Rock, what a great movie
I would just love to study all things relating to women in sci-fi.
Like why when a character appears wearing a helmet / mask / headcovering, once they get around to taking it off they are always female?
Marita recently posted..A day in the life of Stuff With Thing